One LNG project is already shipping fuel overseas. Another hasn’t yet found a developer. But perhaps the real story isn’t about who’s first or what projects are going ahead, it’s about why it matters. The growing potential for Canadian LNG to displace higher-emitting fuels like coal in global markets is capturing attention internationally and among engaged women across the country. For them, energy policy is also economic and climate policy, grounded in leadership and Canada’s global responsibility.
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith recently cited a Fraser Institute study suggesting that if Canada were to double natural gas production and displace coal in Asia, global emissions would drop. “By moving more natural gas, we can also help countries transition away from higher-emitting fuels, such as coal,” Smith said.
This summer, whispers of Norwegian interest in bringing an LNG export terminal to Quebec’s North Shore sparked fresh attention and renewed hope for many working to strengthen Canada’s energy and economic independence. Quebec’s Premier has tempered expectations, pointing out there’s “no proponent at the moment”, but global appetite hasn’t paused for polite skepticism. Earlier this summer, in Kitimat, B.C., LNG Canada began shipping Canadian gas overseas. That success story is a model showing how Canadian LNG can be both economically viable and climate-conscious, setting a new precedent for energy development.
As Canada Powered by Women has learned through its research and national surveys, 77 per cent of engaged women support the development and export of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to help provide energy security and to generate revenue for Canada. LNG development can also displace high-emitting energy sources like coal on a global scale. Eighty per cent of engaged women think it’s important that oil and gas contributes to lower emissions. This is an opportunity to power the world, and contribute to global emissions reduction.